Vote for Les

Home | Taxpayers Party of Michigan | National Constitution Party | Historic Documents | Contact Me



Proposed Constitutional Amendment on Multiple Issues


JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage, equal rights, the prohibition of discrimination, birthright citizenship requirements, the prohibition of laws which deny individuals basic liberty and the requirement that all spending be allowed by the Constitution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein).

"Article --

"SECTION 1.     Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any State, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups."

"SECTION 2.     Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of gender, religion or race."

"SECTION 3. There shall be no discrimination against or preferences for any citizen or legal resident of the United States on account of gender, religion or race."

"SECTION 4. All persons born in the United States, who have one or more parents who are citizens of the United States, and all persons naturalized as citizens, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. A natural born citizen is a person who is born in the United States or a Territory of the United States to parents who are United States citizens."

"SECTION 5. There shall be no law which prohibits the growing, possession, marketing or use of any herb."

"SECTION 6. There shall be no law which has a primary purpose of protecting people from themselves."

"SECTION 7. Congress shall make no law requiring the purchase of any good or service."

"SECTION 8. There shall be no law which exempts any governmental unit or body, except the military, from the provisions of such law."

"SECTION 9.  Private property shall not be taken for private use by different owners."

"SECTION 10. Every appropriation bill passed by Congress must provide the section or sections in the Constitution which allow the spending proposed by the bill. Failure to provide this information shall render the bill null and void, and any citizen of the United States shall have standing to question the spending proposed or authorized by any spending bill."

"SECTION 11. Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of these articles."

"SECTION 12. This amendment shall take effect one year after the date of ratification."


   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


An explanation of the items listed above.

1.   This is the marriage amendment which was last voted on in 2006. Because of the recent attempt to have the Federal Court use a judge created equal protection provision to destroy the traditional definition of marriage, this amendment is now necessary to preserve the sanctity of marriage as a union between a man and a woman. An amendment to the Constitution would provide the same definition of marriage is all states. The proposed resolution linked from the page on same sex marriage would only strip appellate jurisdiction from the Federal Courts on the issue of marriage and states would still be free to define marriage. The exception to appellate jurisdiction on the issue of marriage would be faster and easier to pass in congress, but would not result in the uniform definitions provided by an amendment.

2.   This is the equal rights amendment first proposed in 1923 by the gender feminists. The word sex was replaced by the term gender and the amendment was expanded to include race and religion.

3.   Equality of Rights is not the same an non-discrimination. This amendment is necessary to protect individuals against discrimination allowed by Congress or the Courts. The courts have been allowing discrimination against specific groups based on gender and ethnicity to correct allegations of past discrimination. This action is particularly egregious in view of the fact that the people discriminated against had no part in the alleged past actions. This provision is also necessary to protect us from the ongoing attempt to by the Islamists to impose Sharia Law.  Sharia Law gives special privileges to Muslims, and subjugates all who are not Muslim, as a means of forcing everyone to convert to Islam.

4.   This amendment is necessary to limit birthright citizenship to the children of U.S. citizens, and to clarify the definition of "natural born citizen". The language in the 14th Amendment gives birthright citizenship to anyone born in the United States. Another amendment is necessary to limit citizenship to the children of U.S. Citizens and clarify the definition of Natural Born Citizen.

5.   This amendment will have the effect of legalizing marijuana. I do not use marijuana and I do not recommend anyone use it, or any other mind altering substance. The Libertarians regard the laws against marijuana as being a form of prohibition and the crime and corruption which has resulted from these laws supports their claim. My objection is different. Genesis Chapter 1, Verse 29 provides "And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat." If god has provided herbs for man to use, no government has any business making any herb illegal. As far as I am concerned, a higher authority has spoken.

6.   This amendment is aimed at prohibiting nanny state laws. Lawmakers and bureaucrats should not have the power to micromanage peoples lives by deciding what is good for them. We as individuals have the responsibility to decide what is in our own best interests, not the government. Another effect of this amendment would be to eliminate laws against drug use. There have been studies indicating that it is far more cost effective to treat drug addicts than to incarcerate them. The provision would not stop laws which target the drug dealers since the pushers and distributors are involved in activities which harm others.

7.   This provision would render Obamacare unconstitutional and prohibit this type of law in the future. Please note that the language says Congress shall make no law, not that there shall be no law. Because the prohibition is against Congress, the states can still require people to purchase insurance, such as auto insurance, which is a power reserved to the states by the tenth amendment. This amendment is necessary because Congress is going far beyond the limits provided by the Constitution.

8.   This amendment will require all governments to abide by the laws they pass. Currently there are many laws which exempt the government from the costs and burdens of compliance. If our governments had to abide by all of the rules and regulations they impose on individuals and business, there would be a reduction in laws and regulations. The exception for the military is necessary to allow the military the flexibility needed to provide for our national defense. We must end "do as I say and not as I do".

9.    This is a provision which overturns the Kelo decision of the Supreme Court. The right to own property is central to a free society and an economy based on free enterprise. When a government can take property with the intent that the property be given or sold to others, we no longer have a free country.

10.  This provision is necessary to  limit appropriations and spending to the necessary functions of the Federal Government. In my opinion this type of amendment is preferable to a balanced budget amendment, which would cause politicians in Washington to cut necessary government functions in a effort to justify raising taxes. Earmarks and pork barrel spending will end when they must be shown to be for spending allowed a one of the enumerated functions of the Federal Government under the Constitution.

11.  This is a provision which allows the provisions of these amendments to be enabled by specific legislation.

12.  This provision simply sets an effective date. The effective date is delayed for a year to allow time for laws to be reviewed and amended or repealed as necessary.


   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any amendment to the Constitution would have to go through the committee process in Congress and issues listed above could be changed or eliminated. These items are listed of examples of changes needed to restrict the ongoing grab for power by the Federal Government.  The Constitution was written to restrict the power of government and protect the rights of citizens.  When the courts or an out of control President are violating the rights of our citizens, the amendment process allows our citizens to elect people to Congress who can make changes to stop the abuse of power. This process is not easy and the super majorities in Congress and for the ratification by the states is present to prevent the tyranny of an arbitrary majority.

The President does not have the power to veto a Constitutional Amendment because his signature is not required on the amendment.

The Court is bound by the amendment since the Constitution is the preeminent law of the land. The court has traditionally had the power to interpret the Constitution, but it must be noted that the power granted to Congress to make exceptions and write regulations, on the courts appellate review authority, does give Congress the power to overrule the court when it overreaches. Congress has been shirking it's responsibility by not using this authority.

There can be situations where the actions of a judge are so egregious that impeachment is appropriate. Under the provisions in the constitution this action is nothing more than having Congress fire the judge. Because the action is nothing more than the firing of the judge, it should be far more common.

The voters can and should replace the left-wing radicals who control Congress with people who will act to stop the growth in the power and control of the Federal Government, then reduce the size, scope and cost of the government.

voteforles.info

Paid for with regulated funds by the Committee to elect Les Townsend

P.O. Box 67, Fraser, MI 48026-0067